Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
D. P. Uniyal, J.
Chhangu – Appellant
Versus
Dukhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing the chain of inheritance and dispute over tenancy. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. debate over joint versus self-acquired property. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. legal implications of a female tenant's rights under tenancy law. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. finality of appeal outcomes and responsibilities. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
1. Second Appeal No. 2693 of 1962 arises out of Suit No. 631 of 1954 instituted by Dukhi respondent against Chhangu and others, appellants, for a declaration that plots detailed in Schedules, A, B, C and D are in possession of the respondent as bhumidhar, and for cancellation of a gift deed dated 2-9-1939 executed by Smt. Govindi, widow of Gajadhar, in favour of the appellants Chhangu and others, as also for cancellation of the compromise dated 17-7-1940 in partition suit No. 44 of 1940 (Dukhi and others v. Smt. Govindi and others) decided on 31-3-1942.
Second Appeal No. 2660 of 1962 arises out of Suit No. 105 of 1956 instituted by Chhanga appellant against Dukhi and others respondents for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with his possession over the properties of Schedules A and B.
2. In order to appreciate
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
