Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
S. R. Ghosh, J
Chief Inspector of Stamps – Appellant
Versus
Vishnu Pratap Sugar Works, Pvt. Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. establishing the grounds and context for the appeal in court fees. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on how injunctions relate to declarations under the court fees act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. clarification on legal definitions and the scope of instruments in law. (Para 10 , 12 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. final determination on the rulings about additional payments under court fee provisions. (Para 25 , 26) |
1. This order shall govern Civil Revisions Nos. 1095 and 1097 of 1964, both by the Chief Inspector of Stamps, against the order of the Civil Judge of Deoria passed in two suits instituted by the opposite parties, Vishnu Pratap Sugar Works, Pvt. Ltd., Khadda, and Ishwari Khetan Sugar Mills, Pvt. Ltd., Lachhmigunj.
2. The reliefs sought for in the suit instituted by Vishnu Pratap Sugar Works were that the State of Uttar Pradesh, its servants and agents be restrained by a permanent injunction from realising or taking any steps for the realization of the aforementioned sum of Rs. 33,74,754.77 from the plaintiff company as arrears of land revenue or otherwise and, in the alternative the State of Uttar Pradesh be restrained by permanent injunction from realising from the plaintiff company an
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
