ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
A, B, JJ
Seth Munna Lal v. Seth Jai Prakas
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. question of non-appearance and its procedural implications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments presented on procedural correctness. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's interpretation of rules prioritizing justice. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. final determination on the permissible actions. (Para 7) |
1. The following question has been referred to this Full Bench for opinion : -
"Whether a decision recorded specifically under O. 17, R. 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure would exclude relief under the provisions contained in O.9 of the Civil P. C. irrespective of the question whether, in recording its decision under R. 3, the Court acted rightly or wrongly?" The question arises in the following circumstances: A suit was filed by the respondent against the appellant for rendition of accounts and recovery of commission. May 6, 1965, was an adjourned data of hearing. On this date, the defendant was absent and the Court recorded an order in the order sheet (English note) to the following effect : -
"This is an adjourned date of hearing because the defendant had been allowed adjournment on the previous date, viz., 14-4-1965. The defendant to - day has failed to appear and, in my view, this suit should be heard
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.