SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Online)(All) 34

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
, J
Firm Rupram Kailash Nath v. Co-operative Union Mallawah


Table of Content
1. plaintiff's claim for recovery based on agent's authorization. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments pertain to the agency and duties of the second defendant. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court discusses the authority and implications under the indian contract act. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)
4. final ruling restores the trial court decree against both defendants. (Para 10)

1. This is a plaintiff's appeal arising out of a suit for recovery of Rupees 2.034-6-9 from the first defendant through the second defendant.

2. The plaintiff firm was carrying on commission agency business in cloth at Kanpur. The first defendant, the co - operative Union, Mallawah, district Hardoi (hereinafter called the society) had appointed the second defendant Sri Ram Chandra Pandey as their sales agent. It was stated in the written statement filed by the first defendant that the second defendant was employed in the Co - operative Union Mallawah as a salesman "on salary or commission". The second defendant purchased cloth worth Rupees 1857 15-3 from the plaintiff on credit for the first defendant and further borrowed Rupees 50 from the plaintiff for defraying the octroj duty and transport charges. Admittedly cloth was pu


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top