SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Online)(All) 21

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
, J
Ameer v. Sub-Divisional Magistrate Varanasi (S)


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Not stated
For the Respondents: Not stated

Table of Content
1. introduction of the writ petition and initial orders (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. interpretation of judicial terms and definitions under the act (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. rationale for including section 53 under criminal cases (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. final ruling and allowance of the writ petition (Para 13)

1. This writ petition has come up before us upon a reference made by a learned single Judge of this Court.

2. Under S.53 of the U. P. Panchayat Raj Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act), each of the petitioners was ordered by the Nyaya Panchavat of village Khewali, district Varanasi, to execute a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50 with one surety of like amount for keeping the peace for a period of fifteen days. The order of the Nyaya Panchayat provided that in case of default in executing the required bond a penalty of Rs. 5 per day shall be imposed on each defaulting petitioner. Against that order the petitioners filed an application in revision under S.89 of the Act before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate Varanasi (S) who dismissed It on the ground that no revision lay. The view that the Magistrate took was that an order under S.53 is not an order in a "criminal cas





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top