ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
D. S. Mathur, J
Indian Ceramic House Agra v. Sales Tax Officer II Sector Agr
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interpretation of rule 41 sub-rules (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. distinction between ratio decidendi and obiter dicta (Para 3 , 4 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. authority limits in provisional assessments (Para 5 , 10 , 12 , 29) |
| 4. binding nature of judicial pronouncements (Para 13 , 15) |
| 5. dealer's entitlement regarding tax deposits (Para 16 , 30) |
1. D. S. Mathur, J. : - In these Writ Petitions the following question has been referred to us for decision in view of the conflict in two decisions of this Court, namely, M/s. Adarsh Bhandar v. Sales Tax Officer, Aligarh , AIR 1957 All 475 (FB) and Steel Enterprises (Pvt.) Ltd. v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1969 All LJ 399.
"Whether in view of the various sub-rules of R.41, U. P. Sales Tax Rules, a dealer is entitled to deposit the tax admitted by him to be due and whether the assessing authority is entitled to make an enquiry whether the position assumed by the dealer as to his liability was justified in law, while making the provisional assessment?"
AIR 1957 All 475 (FB) (Supra) is a Full Bench decision, wherein Mootham, C. J. observed as below : -
"Under sub-rule (3) of R.41 the Sales Tax Officer is empowered to make an assessment to the best of his ju
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.