Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
G.C. Mathur, J
Isherdas Sahni and Brothers – Appellant
Versus
Government of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the lease and licensing issues. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petition and responses from parties. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 3. legal framework of the cinematograph act and licensing. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. discussion on the legality of licence provisions. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. importance of legal ownership in licence applications. (Para 18 , 23) |
| 6. possession issues concerning ejectment. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 7. court discretion in licensing authority decisions. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. government authority in licensing decisions. (Para 27 , 28) |
| 9. final dismissal of the writ petition. (Para 29) |
1. In this writ petition the petitioner firm, namely, Isherdas Sahni and Brothers, seeks to get quashed by a writ in the nature of certiorari or like writ, order or direction, three orders contained in Annexures 13, 14 and 18 to the Writ Petition, the first and the third having been passed by the Government of Uttar Pradesh impleaded as opposite party No.2 and the second one by the District Magistrate of Lucknow (Opposite party No.1) acting as the licensing authority under S.4 of the U.P. Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1955. It also seeks the issue of a writ in the nature of mandamus to opposite party No.1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
