Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
T. Ramabhadran, J
Dr. (Miss) Meena Mukerji – Appellant
Versus
Dr. (Mrs.) Vatsala Samant – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. interpretation of the allahabad university act and its amendments. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conflicts regarding administrative roles in medical education. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. chancellor's jurisdiction in educational appointments. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. limits of the executive council's power in setting qualifications. (Para 10 , 12 , 15) |
| 5. outcome of the writ petition dismissing the challenges to the chancellor's decision. (Para 14 , 18) |
1. This writ petition relates to a matter requiring the interpretation of the Allahabad University Act and the Statutes thereunder. The facts leading to the filing of this writ petition are briefly given below.
2. Before the amendment of the Allahabad University Act, 1921 in 1961 by means of the U.P. Universities Act, 1961 (Act No.13 of 1961), the University was providing the teaching necessary for admission to its various degrees. It had also recognized certain institutions as authorised to provide such teaching. These were privately run colleges and were known under the Act as 'associated colleges'. The State Government intended to start and run an engineering college and a medical college at Allahabad and to secure to the students thereof degrees in
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
