ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
G.D. Sahgal, O.P. Trivedi, Lakshmi Prasad, Gursharan Lal, Jagmohan Lal, K.B. Srivastava, JJ
Baboo Ram v. Ishrat Al
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. tenant's rent payment method and default implications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. initial court findings on tenant's payment method. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. differing opinions of judges on legal definitions. (Para 5 , 10) |
| 4. clarification of definition of 'failed to pay' under specific conditions. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. final ruling on the appropriateness of the legal definitions relative to findings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
1. This second appeal has been filed by a tenant against whom a decree for ejectment has been passed by the lower appellate court though the trial court had dismissed the suit of the plaintiff - respondent. The accommodation, which is the subject - matter of the suit, is governed by the provisions of the U. P. (Temporary) Control of Rent and Eviction Act (to be hereafter called as the Act) which has since been repealed. The ejectment of the tenant was sought by the landlord on the ground that he had committed default within the meaning of S.3 (1) (a) of the Act. A notice dated 16-9-1964 demanding arrears of rent due till then for a period of more than three months was served by the landlord on the tenant on 17-9-1964 requiring him to pay the ar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.