SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Online)(All) 33

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
, J
Kishanlal and Another v. State


Table of Content
1. petitioners sought relief due to floods affecting mineral availability. (Para 1)
2. district magistrate rejected claims improperly. (Para 2)
3. court found procedural flaws in the magistrate's handling of claims. (Para 3)
4. court allows petition and directs reassessment of claims. (Para 4)

1. The petitioners are the auction purchasers of 37 plots enumerated in paragraph 1 of the writ petition situated in village Daulatpur (Kachhar) Pargana and Tahsil Bhognipur District Kanpur. These plots had been let out to them for removing morrum therefrom for a period of three years under an agreement dated 13th October, 1969. On 14th November, 1969, the petitioners moved an application before the respondents Nos. 1 and 2, namely, the State of Uttar Pradesh and the District Officer (Collector, Incharge) saying that the contractors of Jalaun were bringing their morrum for sale at Kanpur and they should be stopped. Thereafter, several letters in this behalf were written by them. Clause (4) of Part III of the Agreement provides that the State Government will not allow any person to store, stock or sell by any means, at Kanpur side villages and banks of river Jamuna, any sand and Mo








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top