ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Malik, CJ
Subhash Chandra Jain v. Vidyut Jai
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. suit pertains to maintenance and jurisdiction post-marriage. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. jurisdiction confirmed as the marriage venue. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 3. court dismisses revision, upholding jurisdiction. (Para 11 , 12) |
1. This is a revision arising out of a suit instituted by the plaintiff - opposite party against the applicant for recovery of amount of Rs. 8,570/- as arrears of maintenance allowance for the period commencing 1st of August, 1969 and ending 30th September, 1971, for future maintenance allowance at the rate of Rs. 400/- per month for return of ornaments of the plaintiff - opposite party alleged to have been illegally detained by the defendant - applicant or in the alternative for an amount of Rs. 11,600/- as compensation therefor and for permanent injunction to restrain the applicant from entering into matrimony with one Km. Ushi or any other girl or woman.
2. The suit was instituted by the opposite party on the allegations that she was married to the applicant according to Jain Dharmashastra on the 8th of June, 1969 at her parents' residence at Etah. It was alleged that while the applicant was employed and lived at Delhi his parents resided at Calcu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.