SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Online)(All) 14

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
H. L. Kapoor, J
Laxmi and Others v. State of U. P.


Table of Content
1. revision filed regarding bail conditions imposed. (Para 1)
2. bail orders considered interlocutory. (Para 2)
3. revision dismissed. (Para 3)

1.This revision has been filed by Laxmi and 5 others against the order dated 13-4-1977 granting bail to them in a case under S. 307 I.P.C. and various other sections. A condition has been imposed that they would not go to the area of the Parsu village without the permission of the Court. It was argued that no reason has been given for imposing this condition and that the order is improper as in the cross case no such condition has been imposed while granting bail to the persons of other party although gun was used by the other party, while only lathis were said to have been used by the party of the applicants. It was further pointed out that subsequently Thakur Das and Har Narain have been granted bail by this Court although their bail had been rejected by the learned Sessions Judge. Much stress was laid on the fact that no such condition has been imposed by the High Court while granting bail to Thakur Das and Har Narain. This is certainly an additional circumstance which the learned Sessions Judge should take into consideratio



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top