Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Judge, J
Basant Lal and Others v. Dr. Dwarka Prasad Varshney and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the suit arises from a recovery claim contingent on property transactions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the appeal challenges the validity of attachment and the elapsed time for claims. (Para 3 , 10) |
| 3. the court affirmed adherence to legal standards concerning debt recovery from properties. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. counsel presented arguments regarding limitations and attachment as contingent. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 5. final dismissal of appeal confirming lower court findings. (Para 12) |
1. This is a defendant' s second appeal in a suit for recovery of Rs. 3760-00, and, in order to ensure recovery, for a charge on a single storeyed house with land and chabutra pertaining thereto situated in the Court of Wards compound at Aligarh. There were two sets of defendants in the case. The three appellants were defendants of the first set. The defendant - respondents Nos. 4 to 10 were the defendants of the second set.
2. The case of the plaintiff - respondents was that Hari Mohan, the ancestor of the defendants second set, had sold the aforesaid house on which charge for securing recovery of the amount claimed was sought, for the sum of Rs. 15,000/- on November 7, 1951 in favour of Smt. Bhagwati Devi, wife
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
