SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Online)(All) 17

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
M. Wahajuddin, J.
Qasim and Others v. State and Others


Table of Content
1. consideration of procedural adherence in issuing warrants. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. clarification on the treatment of protest petitions and correctness of the cognizance taken. (Para 4 , 5)

1. The applicants have been summoned under S.147, S.148, S.323, S.324 and S.307 I. P. C. as per order dt. 19-2-1983, Annexure 4. It would appear that the police submitted a final report in this case. A protest petition was preferred and the Magistrate then passed the following order : -
"Perused case diaries, application and other papers. In the cross case the accused have been challaned.
Prima facie offences u/s.147/148/324/323/307 IPC are made out against accused Qasim @ Fausi, Sukha Asghar, Mohd. Amin, Kamil. Hayat. Liyaqat. Mishtaq. Aalim, Amir, Ahmad. Hanif, Shaukat, Popat Jamil, Shakil Ahmad and Zafar and there are sufficient grounds to proceed against them.
Issue warrants of arrest against them. Fix 24-3-1983.
sd / MQ. Siddiqi
J. M. I. 19-2-1983."

2. It is urged that the order is illegal and without jurisdiction and is a non - speaking order and was based mechanically and the Magistrate was bound to follow the procedure for a complaint case which the Magistrate has failed to do




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top