SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Online)(All) 1

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
, J
State of U.P. v. Prem Singh Vahi and Another


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri Ram Prasad Singh
For the Respondents: None

Table of Content
1. factual background relating to the petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. court's observations concerning statutory interpretation. (Para 3 , 7 , 14)
3. arguments presented by the parties. (Para 5 , 6)
4. explanation of the statutory provisions and their application. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
5. final ruling by the court. (Para 22 , 23)

1. The present petition under Art. 126 of the Constitution is directed against the order dt. 1-9-82 passed in an appeal under S.33 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulations) Act, 1976, (hereinafter referred to as the Act), by the District Judge, Gorakhpur.

2. The facts of the case lie in a very narrow campass. The provisions of the Act were enforced in the area and respondent 1 filed his statement under S. 6(1) of the Act stating that he holds an area of 167 sq. mtrs. in Mohalla Mohaddipur, District Gorakhpur and another area of 363.87 sq. mtrs. He further alleged that he has an area of 1497 sq. mtrs. in Khasra No. 389. In short respondent 1 has got two houses owned by him and both are residential houses and no area was liable to be declared surplus.

3. The State of U. P. contested the case of respondent 1 and it was alleged that the land of responden




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top