SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1986 Supreme(Online)(All) 6

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Hon. Niamutullah, J
M/s R. C. Gupta and Sons – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, Allahabad Division – Respondent


Table of Content
1. petitioner's grievance against suspension of arms licence. (Para 1 , 2)
2. authority of appellate body and its jurisdiction limitations. (Para 3 , 4)
3. requirements for remanding cases and statutory authority. (Para 5 , 6)
4. inherent versus implicit powers of authorities. (Para 7 , 8)
5. recognition of appellate powers in resolving controversies. (Para 9 , 10)
6. conformity with legal precedents in appellate jurisdiction. (Para 11 , 12)
7. outcome of the petition, partial allowance. (Para 13 , 14)

1. Petitioner M/s R. C. Gupta and Sons is aggrieved by an order, D/- 16th June, 1976 passed by the Commissioner, Allahabad Division, Allahabad, in Appeal No 90 of 197576 (Farrukhabad) filed under S. 18, Arms Act . It has accordingly approached this Court for relief under Art. 226 of the Constitution.

2. Petitioner carried on business as arms and ammunition dealer in the city of Farrukhabad under a licence issued to it under the provisions of the Arms Act . On 30-9-1975, office of the District Magistrate, Farrukhabad issued a notice requiring the petitioner to show cause why the licence granted to it be not revoked on various grounds specified therein. In due course, the pet


































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top