SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 Supreme(Online)(All) 7

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
A.P. Sahi, J
Prithvi Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Criminal Appeal | Sessions Trial No. 512 of 1980



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri S. P. Tewari
For the Respondents: AGA

Court ruled that injuries did not indicate intent to kill, modifying convictions to lesser charges under IPC.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 304, 323, and 147 - Conviction of appellants for culpable homicide simpliciter was altered to infliction of grievous hurt, given the nature of injuries and absence of intent to kill - Circumstances did not suggest common object to commit culpable homicide but warranted conviction under S.325/149 instead. (Paras 24, 25)

(B) Criminal Procedure - Time elapsed since the incident and the accused having spent considerable time in jail necessitated a reduction of their sentence to the period already undergone, coupled with a fine instead of substantive imprisonment. (Paras 25, 26)

Facts of the case:
Conviction pertained to an incident where mutual enmity existed, leading to an assault with lathies and a kanta on the deceased and two others, resulting in injuries and the eventual death of Giriwar Singh. Prosecution relied on eyewitness testimonies and medical examinations to establish guilt.

Findings of Court:
The court concluded that the intent to kill was not evident from the circumstances, leading to modified convictions.

Issues: The main issues included the nature of intent during the assault and proper charges under IPC given the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reasoned that injuries inflicted were mostly simple, and there was insufficient evidence to establish intent to kill. Accordingly, a less severe charge was warranted, justifying the modifications of sentences.

Result: Appeal partly allowed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and convicts. (Para 1 , 2 , 4)
2. witness testimonies and injuries. (Para 12 , 14 , 15)
3. assessment of intent and conviction adjustment. (Para 16 , 24)
4. sentence reduction based on elapsed time. (Para 25 , 26)
5. final decision on the appeal. (Para 28)

1. This criminal appeal arises out of the judgment and order dated 30-4-1981 passed by VIth Additional Sessions Judge, Mainpuri in Sessions Trial No. 512 of 1980 whereby the appellants were convicted and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years under S.304/149, IPC and for a further period of imprisonment of six months under S.323/149 read with S.147, . Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. As the appellant Prayag Singh has died, the appeal filed by him has already abated by order of this Court dated 28-1-2004. Apart from Prayag Singh and the other four appellants namely, Prithvi Singh, Parmal, Nawab Singh and Ramveer Singh, one other person namely, Shanker had been made an accused in the FIR. As he had died during the pendency of the trial his case has abated by orders of the trial Court.

3. I have heard Shri S. P. Tewari, learned counsel for the appellants and the learned AGA.

4. In short, the facts of this case are that there was some dispute going on between Prayag Singh, Prithvi Singh and others on one side and Giriwar Singh and Bachan Singh and others on the other. Proceedings under S.107/116 were pending in the Court of S.D.M., Shikohabad. On account of this enmity, on 14-8-1980, when the deceased Giriwar Singh along with his brother Bachan Singh were going to Shikohabad, on the way near the field of Harcharan and Mathuri, the six named accused persons assaulted them with lathies and 'kanta' on the exhortation of Prayag Singh that they should be taught a lesson for indulging in endless litigations and they should be done to death. On hearing the cries, informant Ramesh, Girish, Rajendra and Niranjan arrived at the spot. Girish, who tried to intervene, also received some injuries. On the cries of the witnesses, the accused left the spot saying that the victim has been saved on this occasion, but he would be done to death later. Thereafter, the informant proceeded to the police station Nagla Khanger with the injured Giriwar Singh, Bachan Singh and Girish and lodged the report on 14-8-1980 at about 10.45 a.m. The report was initially lodged under S.147/323/324/325, IPC Constable Gulshan Singh, PW 8 took down the written report and prepared chik report on its basis. Thereafter the Investigating Officer S.I. Atar Singh, PW 5 recorded the statements of Giriwar, Bachan and Girish under S. 161, CrPC and sent the injured for medical examination to Shikohabad hospital. The Investigating Officer then proceeded to record the statements of informant Ramesh, Rajendra and Niranjan Singh and then proceeded to the spot, and prepared site plan as indicated by the informant Ramesh.

5. Medical examination was conducted on injured Bachan Singh on 14-8-1980 at 3.20 p.m., Giriwar Singh on 14-8-1980 at 3.30 p.m. and Girish on 14-8-1980 at 3.40 p.m. by Dr. M. L. Agarwal, PW 1 at Civil Hospital, Shikohabad. The doctor found the following injuries on the person of Bachan Singh :
(1) L.W. in triangle, each line 1 cm. long x up to bone deep on right eyebrow clotted blood present.
(2) Multiple contusion of various sizes overlapping each other on right shoulder blade, shoulder joint and outer surface of upper 2/3 of right arm (number more than 20) size 6 cm. x 2 cm. to 8 cm. x 2 cm red.
(3) Multiple contusion 12 cm. x 2 cm. to 8 cm. x 2 cm. red more than 22 on whole back.
(4) Contusion 10 cm. x 2 cm. red on right costal border.
(5) Contusion 6 cm. x 2 cm. red oblique on post surface middle of right forearm.
(6) Contusion 4 cm. x 2 cm. red bruise on post surface of right forearm 4 cm. above wrist advised X ray.
(7) Traumatic tender swelling red on whole of right hand advised X ray.
(8) Ten contusion 12 cm. 2 cm. to 8 cm. x

























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top