SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 Supreme(Online)(All) 126

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Ashwani Kumar Mishra, J
U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Human Rights Commission – Respondent


Table of Content
1. two petitions contend human rights violations due to electricity accidents. (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments against the extent of compensation set by human rights commissions. (Para 3 , 4)
3. court emphasizes the jurisdiction of human rights commissions under the act. (Para 5 , 6 , 8 , 10 , 11 , 12)
4. the legal basis of human rights violations and compensation recommendations are upheld. (Para 7 , 9 , 13)
5. final rulings affirm previous awards and adjust compensation amounts. (Para 14 , 15 , 17 , 18)

1.These two writ petitions challenging the orders passed by the National Human Rights Commission and other of U.P. Human Rights Commission respectively, raise similar question of law and have been heard together. Brief facts necessary to be noticed of these two writ petitions are; writ petition No. 13821 of 2010 has been filed by the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. challenging the order dated 6.11.2009, recommending General Manager U.P. Power Corporation to pay a sum of Rs. 3,00000/- as monetary relief to the next of kin of deceased Ramadhar Yadav. The deceased Ramadhar Yadav was electrocuted, while working on an electric pole of 11 KV Transmission Line. Ramadhar Yadav was an ele































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top