Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Rajeev Misra, J
Sunil Kumar Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the case and procedural history (Para 2 , 4) |
| 2. description of the injuries and medical evidence (Para 3 , 7) |
| 3. arguments regarding the magistrate's assessment of evidence (Para 5 , 9) |
| 4. reiteration of legal principles regarding final reports (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. outcome of the revision with directives (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
1. Heard Sri. Manish Tiwary, learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
2. The instant revision is directed against the order dated 17.7.2010 passed by ACJM, Court No. 1, Varanasi in final report No. 15 of 2010 under S.323, S.308, S.504, S.506 IPC, Police Station Rohania, District Varanasi whereby the final report submitted by the police was accepted and protest petition filed by revisionist - complainant was rejected.
3. The facts are that the revisionist - complainant Sunil Kumar Agarwal and the accused Ashok Kumar and Anil Kumar are real brothers. They live in the same house. On 22.1.2003, a FIR was lodged by the complainant at Police Station Rohania, District Varanasi stating therein that there was a dispute with the accused persons due to partition of the property in respect of w
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
