Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Raj Mani Chauhan, J.
Saimuddin – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar Singh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts surrounding the accused's initial arrest and the case history. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion on the legality of the protest petitions and locus standi. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. court's observations on the powers of a magistrate regarding further investigation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final decision reflecting the correct interpretation of procedural laws. (Para 18 , 20 , 21) |
1. Heard the learned counsel for the revisionist and the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State as well as perused the documents available on record.
2. This criminal revision under S.397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as the 'Code') has been filed by the accused - revisionist against the impugned order dated 09.9.2010 passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhimpur Kheri in Misc. Criminal Case No. 1221/2010 (Manoj Kumar Singh v. Saimuddin) by which the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate has allowed the protest petition filed by the complainant against the final report submitted by the Investigating Officer (Inspector, CBCID) in case Crime No. 439/2005, under S.51 Wild Life Protection Act and ordered for re - investigation of the case.
3. The re
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
