Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
, J
Sanjeev @ Sanju – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of appellant's challenge against conviction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details of the incident and allegations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 20) |
| 3. court's observations on the appeal and evidentiary standards. (Para 10 , 12 , 17) |
| 4. criticism of trial court's handling of evidence. (Para 14 , 21) |
| 5. overall ruling on acquittal. (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
1. Appellant Sanjeev @ Sanju, through instant jail appeal has questioned the legality and sustainability of his conviction u / S.366, and 376, IPC and awarded sentences of 5 years R.I. with fine of Rs.5,000/- on the first count and 7 years R.I. with fine of Rs.5,000/- on the second count with further direction that in default of payment of fine on each of the counts appellant shall under go three months further simple imprisonment for each of them implanted by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Chandausi, Moradabad in Session Trial No.312 of 2008, State v. Sanjeev @ Sanju, vide impugned judgment and order dated 9.3.2009.
2. Appellant's appeal was admitted on 10.4.2009 and was directed to be listed for final hearing. Today the appeal is listed and in joint agreement with Sri Mohit Singh learned counsel for the appellant, who meanw
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
