Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
, J
Malhotra K. L. v. State of Uttar Pradesh
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner filed for quashing an order due to delayed retirement benefits and flawed inquiry. (Para 1 , 2 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments raised against the legality of the inquiry process and lack of notification. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 15) |
| 3. court observed that inquiry procedures were not followed, establishing grounds for the claim. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 16) |
| 4. inquiry was vitiated due to procedural violations. (Para 17) |
| 5. writ petition allowed with an order to quash the impugned decision. (Para 18) |
1. The petitioner, who happens to be retired Superintending Engineer, has filed the present writ petition with the following prayers.
(II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari to quash the impugned order dated 09.09.09 passed by the respondent No. 1 as communicated vide covering letter dated 22.09.09 of the respondent No. 2 (Annexure - 1 to the accompanying writ petition).
(II) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to forthwith pay to the petitioner his entire post retiral benefits which remains unpaid since last 6 years of his retirement, along with suitable interest thereon. (III) Issue any other and
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
