Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Sri Rohit Agarwal, J
Piyush Kumar v. State of U.P. Thru' Secretary Lucknow and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. directors' liability under electricity supply agreements. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. definition of 'consumer' and relevant statutes. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's reasoning on liability provisions. (Para 9 , 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. final ruling on recovery proceedings. (Para 10 , 12 , 15 , 16) |
1. We have heard Sri Rohit Agarwal for the petitioner. Sri Pankaj Kumar Shukla appears for the U.P. Power Corporation Ltd through Executive Engineer, Distribution Division, Bijnor.
2. The petitioner was a Director of the U.P. Lime Chem. Ltd - a public limited Company registered under the Companies Act 1956, with its registered office situated at Haridwar Road, Bijnor.
3. The Company entered into an agreement with the Executive Engineer, Electricity Distribution Division - I Bijnor on 22.2.1990, for supply of 335 KVA electricity load. The agreement was signed by the petitioner as a director of Company. Clause 13 of the agreement provided that any notice by the supplier to the consumer shall be deemed to be duly given and served, if it is addressed to the consumer and delivered by hand at, or sent by registered post to the address specified in the consumer's application or as subsequently noti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
