ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Dharnidhar Jha, Ramesh Sinha, JJ.
Raju Janki Yadav v. State of U. P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. right to access statements recorded under s.164, cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. nature of statements as public documents. (Para 3 , 5 , 6 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. final determination on access and rights. (Para 4 , 13) |
| 4. clarification on access rights versus previous cases. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 5. rejection of non-relevant prohibitions on access. (Para 8 , 12) |
1. We had by our order dated 3.4.2012 directed the petition to be listed before us for deciding the issue as to whether an accused or a victim of an offence was entitled to a copy of the statement of the victim recorded under S.164, Cr.P.C. by a judicial Magistrate, if an application is duly made and the court fee which is required for obtaining such a copy of such statement is paid by the desirous person.
2. It so happened that while hearing this petition, we are informed that it was in practise in the State of U.P. in various courts that they refuse to supply the certified copies of 164 Cr.P.C. statement of a witness or the victim of an offence even if the party is willing to obtain a copy of such a document and is ready to pay the cost legally admissible for issuing the same.
3. We were in fact not ready to accept the contention. We we
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.