Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
D. Y. Chandrachud, C. J., Dilip Gupta, J.
Rashtriya Kisan Mazdoor Sangathan (Regd.) thru Convenor v. State of U. P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's intervention for cane dues is necessary. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. outstanding dues to farmers addressed. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. sugar mills' financial burden raised. (Para 5 , 19) |
| 4. financial arrangements must comply with statutory provisions. (Para 7 , 24 , 30) |
| 5. banks' rights and obligations discussed. (Para 20 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. statutory charge created for cane dues payment. (Para 26 , 28 , 31) |
| 7. court's final orders regarding sale of sugar. (Para 44 , 49 , 50) |
1. These proceedings in the public interest seeking a direction to the State Government for ensuring the realisation of cane dues payable by sugar mills in the State of Uttar Pradesh to cane growers, comprising of the cane price and interest for crushing season 2013-14, were entertained by this Court on 30 May 2014 when interim directions were issued for the first time.
2. The legal basis of the petition was an alleged : (i) breach by the sugar mills of the statutory obligation under the U.P. Sugarcane (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Act, 1953 (the Act) of paying over sugarcane dues to the cane growers; and (ii) failure of the State Government to initiate steps for recovery of the dues in accordance with law. Th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
