SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(All) 60

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Amitava Lala, J
Sadan Bhadauriya alias Jagat Pal Singh – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Criminal Appeal | No. 122 of 2013



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri Vinay Saran, Sri V. K. Upadhyay
For the Respondents: Sri B.B. Dubey, learned A.G.A.

An injured witness's testimony, which is significant in establishing guilt, can confirm the prosecution's case, and delays in lodging FIR can be validly explained without undermining the case.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 307 and 506 - Criminal Appeal - Conviction under Section 307 IPC upheld - The appellant was convicted for attempt to murder based on the evidence of the injured witness, corroborated by medical evidence of grievous injuries inflicted with a weapon, and the prosecution established its case beyond reasonable doubt. Delay in filing the FIR was explained sufficiently and did not undermine the prosecution’s case. (Paras 2, 21, 30, 36)

(B) Evidence Act - Status of injured witnesses - Injured witnesses hold a special status; their testimony is considered highly reliable and significant in supporting the prosecution case. (Paras 26, 27)

Facts of the case:
The informant reported an attack on his father involving grievous knife injuries inflicted by the appellant and accomplices during a property dispute. The father’s attempts to resist resulted in serious injuries, thereby establishing the context for the case.

Findings of Court:
The Court confirmed the trial court's findings regarding the conviction, deemed the evidence presented by the injured witness credible, and affirmed the penalty as proportionate to the crime.

Issues: The main issues included the evaluation of evidence provided by the injured witness and the justifications for the conviction in light of the prosecution’s explanation for the delayed FIR.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reiterated that the intentions behind the act must be considered for an attempt to murder charge and confirmed the trial Court’s findings were aligned with the evidence provided, thereby supporting the conviction against the appellant.

Result: The appeal is dismissed. The conviction and sentence recorded by the trial Court against the accused-appellant is affirmed.

Table of Content
1. summarizes the basis of the criminal charge. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. details the evidence supporting the prosecution's case. (Para 4 , 10 , 12 , 14)
3. discusses the reliability of the injured witness's testimony. (Para 21 , 28 , 29)
4. outlines the court's final decision and reasoning. (Para 30 , 36 , 39)

1. This Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 6.7.2013 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 6, Etawah in Sessions Trial No. 122 of 2011 (State Vs. Sadan Bhadauriya alias Jagat Pal Singh) arising out of case crime no. 79 of 2011 under S.307, S.506 IPC, P.S. Kotwali, District Etawah whereby the appellant Sadan Bhadauriya alias Jagat Pal Singh was convicted under S.307 IPC and sentenced to undergo R.I. for seven years and a fine of Rs.5000/-. In case of default in payment of fine, he shall further undergo additional S.I. for a period of six months.

2. The prosecution story, briefly stated, was that the informant Saurabh Gupta gave a written report (Ex.Ka. - 3Ka) on 30.1.2011 at Police Station Kotwali, Etawah stating therein that there is a property dispute going on between his father Shesh Kumar Gupta son of Jyoti Shanker Porwal resident of 47 Saidwada, Etawah and Uncle (Tau) Anand Kumar Porwal son of Late Jyoti Shanker Porwal and cousin brother Ankur Gupta alias Jony son of Late Sushil Kumar. In connection to the said property dispute, a litigation was pending in the Court and often Panchayat was going on. They are the resident of mohalla Saidwada, Etawah. Sadan Bhadauriya alias Jagat Pal Singh and Bharat Singh Bhadauriya both sons of Late Shishupal Singh were the partners in their cold storage. On 29.1.2011, the informant and his father were returning home from friends colony on a splendor motorcycle bearing registration no.U.P.75 - H - 4604. They had gone to the house of their friend to give payment of Rs.3 lacs, but his friend did not meet, therefore they were returning to their home. At about 8:30 p.m., near the office of Basic Shiksha Parishad, Sadan Bhadauriya alias Jagat Pal Singh, Bharat Singh Bhadauriya and unknown persons intercepted the informant and his father and started hurling abuses to them. When his father resisted, all the three accused persons armed with knives attacked his father with intention to kill him, they also inflicted several injuries on the neck and stomach of his father by making deadly assault. Sadan Bhadauriya was repeatedly exhorting that he should not be spared. He also snatched the bag carrying Rs.3 lacs. All the three accused persons, assuming his father to be dead, chased the informant on which the informant left his motorcycle and ran away towards the bushes to save his life. The accused persons threw his father in the bushes at the roadside. The whole incident was witnessed by the informant in the light of the tractor coming from the other side. Again the accused persons started searching for the informant. Due to fear, the informant could not go to his house nor he went to the police station at that time. When he came to the police station, he became aware that somebody has given information to the police regarding the incident. Anand Kumar Porwal and Ankur Gupta alias Jony hatched conspiracy in connivance with the accused persons to kill his father. On earlier occasion also, they threatened his father to kill in his presence and in this context an application was given to the higher police officials regarding the threat.

3. On the basis of written report (Ex.Ka. - 3Ka), chick F.I.R. Ex.Ka. - 2 was registered on 30.1.2011 at 14:25 hours as case crime no.79 of 2011 under S.394, S.307, S.506, S.120 - B IPC at P.S. Kotwali, Etawah. Entry was also made in the G.D., the carbon copy of which is Ex.Ka. - 3. Investigation was carried on.

4. After the incident, injured Shesh Kumar was admitted in the District Hospital, Etawah for treatment. He was medically examined on 29.1.2011 at 9:15 P.M by P.W.1 Dr. V. K. Sahu, who was posted as Heart Speciali

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top