Arun @ Bheem vs State of U.P. - 2016 Supreme(Online)(All) 65

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2016 Supreme(Online)(All) 65

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Ranjana Pandya, J.
Arun @ Bheem – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. – Respondent

Table of Content
1. establishes the case narrative through victim's statement and corroborative evidence. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 7)
2. discusses the reliability of familial witnesses in light of potential bias. (Para 8)
3. clarifies sentencing guidelines under the juvenile justice statute. (Para 10)

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A.

2. This criminal appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 29.06.2013, passed by Additional Sessions Judge / Special Judge (SC / ST Act), Meerut, in Sessions Trial No. 114 of 2007 (State of U.P. vs. Arun @ Bheem), registered as Case Crime No. 337 of 2006, under S.376, S.506, S.323, I.P.C. and S.3(2)(5) SC / ST Act, Police Station Partapur, District Meerut, whereby the appellant has been convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable under S.376 I.P.C. for 7 years rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,000/- with default stipulation.

3. Brief facts of the prosecution case according to first information report and the prosecution story is that on 09.10.2006, the sister of the informant namely Sunita had gone to the field for bringing fodder. On the way, she met the accused Arun @ Bheem, who put a country