Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Not mentioned,
Jeetan Kurmi – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of case filing and events leading to fir. (Para 1 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. details of charges and accusations against appellants. (Para 3 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. appellants' arguments challenging evidence and prosecution's case. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. prosecution's rebuttal and response to appellants' claims. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. court's conviction of appellants based on reliable evidence. (Para 31 , 32 , 46) |
| 6. classification of rarity regarding death penalty justification. (Para 34 , 35) |
| 7. consideration of motives and categorization of crime severity. (Para 37 , 38 , 45) |
| 8. final decision regarding the sentences of the appellants. (Para 48) |
1. Capital Case No. 1358 of 2013 was filed (from jail) on behalf of Jeetan Kurmi and Others, Capital Case No. 1909 of 2013 Jeetan Kurmi and Others Vs. State and Capital Case No. 2003 of 2013 Ashok Patel & Another Vs. State, were filed through counsels. Reference No. 6 of 2013 is for confirmation of Capital punishment in Session Trial No. 217 of 2008.
2. Mr. Daya Shanker Mishra and Mr. Chandrakesh Mishra, learned Advocates appeared on behalf of appellants Jeetan Kurmi, Nand Kishore, Saijnath, Shiv Ji Yadav. Mr. Kameshwar Singh, lea
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
