Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Unknown, J
Nand Lal Yadav @ Nanda – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding credibility of evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 23 , 25) |
| 3. court's analysis of evidence and witness credibility. (Para 11 , 12 , 18 , 21 , 31) |
| 4. establishes that motive is not essential in direct evidence. (Para 24 , 36 , 41) |
| 5. final decision on conviction and sentencing. (Para 42 , 43) |
1. Heard Sri Rajiv Lochan Shukla assisted by Sri Chandra Jeet Yadav learned counsel for the appellant and Sri Saghir Ahmad, Sri J. K. Upadhyay, Sri Irfan Chaudhary and Sri Syed Hasan Shaukat Abidi learned AGA in opposition.
2. Appellant Nand Lal Yadav @ Nanda has preferred this appeal under S.374(2) Cr.P.C. against the judgment and order dated 12.6.2012 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge Court no. 5, Azamgarh in S.T. No. 499 of 2006 (State vs. Nand Lal @ Nanda and three others), by which the appellant has been convicted under S.302 read with S.34 I.P.C. and sentenced to imprisonment for life and fine of Rs. 5000 / and in default of payment of fine two months additional imprisonment.
3. The facts of this case in brief are that the complainant Hira Lal Yadav, son of Shobhnath, resident of villageSiswa, Post Bac
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
