SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(All) 35

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
A. P. Sahi, Sanjay Harkauli, JJ
Atul Sharma and Another v. State of U. P. throu. its Prin. Secy. Deptt. of Housing and Others


Table of Content
1. discussion of compensation benefits under the 2013 act (Para 1 , 2)
2. argument for the 2013 act benefits to apply to the 1965 act acquisitions (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. clarification of legislative repugnancy and incorporation (Para 10 , 11 , 12)
4. analysis of legislative intent and fields of law (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20)
5. final assertion on dismissal of the petition for benefits (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26)

1. This writ petition has been filed claiming benefits of the provisions of Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act , 2013 (hereinafter referred to as the 2013 Act) on the ground that in the present case though the land has been acquired under the U.P. Awas Vikas Parishad Adhiniyam , 1965 (hereinafter referred to as the 1965 Act), the petitioners are entitled to all benefits under 2013 Act inasmuch as if such benefit is denied the same would violate Art.14 of the Constitution of India. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if such benefits are available in relation to acquisitions under the Land Acquisition Act , 1894 (hereinafter referred to as the 1894 Act)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top