Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Rakesh Kumar Jain, J
Gopal Krishna – Appellant
Versus
Dr. Rajesh Bhatia – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. complaint filed regarding medical service payment and insufficient receipt. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments over legal obligations related to payment and medical reimbursement. (Para 7 , 9) |
| 3. court's evaluation of the standards for deception under s.420 ipc. (Para 10 , 12 , 14 , 17) |
| 4. clarification on the necessary elements for establishing the offence of cheating. (Para 11 , 13 , 15) |
| 5. quashing of proceedings due to lack of evidence for prima facie case. (Para 18 , 19) |
1. Heard Sri Murli Manohar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Manish Bajpai, assisted by Sri Punit Saxena, learned counsel for opposite party No. 2 as well as learned AGA for opposite party No. 1 and perused the record.
2. Petition has been preferred to quash the proceedings of Complaint Case No.180 of 2006 (Gopal Krishna v. Dr. Rajesh Bhatia), under S.420, IPC, Police Station Gomti Nagar, Lucknow pending before the Court of Additional Judicial Magistrate, Court No.37, Lucknow and judgment and order dated 9.8.2007 passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Criminal Revision No.233 of 2007; Dr. Rajesh Bhatia v. State and Ors. whereby the revision was dismissed and summoning order passed by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
