SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(All) 48

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Not stated, J
Sapna Tiwari v. Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act)


Advocates:
For the Appellant/Petitioner: Sri D. K. Tripathi
For the Respondents: Sri Anoop Srivastava

1. This petition under Art.227 of the Constitution has been filed challenging the order dated 21.07.2017, passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lucknow by means of which the application for grant of temporary injunction moved by the petitioner in Regular Suit No. 2492 of 2015 was rejected as well as the order dated 06.01.2018, passed by the Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lucknow in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 93 of 2017 upholding the order dated 21.07.2017. For the sake of convenience, the petitioner and Sanat Kumar, the respondent no. 2 will also be referred to by their ranks in the suit as 'plaintiff' and 'defendant' respectively.

2. The defendant, was the owner of 1/3rd share in Khatauni No. 00272, Khasra Nos. 263, 397 - C, 597, 690, 709, 657, 658, 686/1, 688, 689/1, 740/1 situated in village Hardoialal Nagar, Pargana Kakori, Tehsil and District Lucknow. An agreement to sell dated 18.01.2014 with respect to 0.4226 hectare of the above mentioned khasra numbers was entered into between the defendant and the plaintiff. The agreement to sell was duly registered before the Sub-Registrar (Fourth), Lucknow on 18.01.2014.

3. As per the said agreement, the defendant was to sell the suit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top