Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Not stated, J
Sapna Tiwari v. Special Judge (Prevention of Corruption Act)
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to injunction order based on registered agreement. (Para 1 , 2 , 10) |
| 2. allegations of contract non-performance and attempts to seek injunction. (Para 3 , 4 , 6) |
| 3. criteria for granting temporary injunction discussed. (Para 12 , 15 , 19) |
| 4. court's emphasis on preservation of property during litigation. (Para 16 , 21) |
| 5. legal arguments regarding readiness and willingness. (Para 24 , 26) |
| 6. final order granting temporary injunction and expediting trial. (Para 28 , 29) |
1. This petition under Art.227 of the Constitution has been filed challenging the order dated 21.07.2017, passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Lucknow by means of which the application for grant of temporary injunction moved by the petitioner in Regular Suit No. 2492 of 2015 was rejected as well as the order dated 06.01.2018, passed by the Special Judge, Anti Corruption, Lucknow in Misc. Civil Appeal No. 93 of 2017 upholding the order dated 21.07.2017. For the sake of convenience, the petitioner and Sanat Kumar, the respondent no. 2 will also be referred to by their ranks in the suit as 'plaintiff' and 'defendant' respectively.
2. The defendant, was the owner of 1/3rd share in Khatauni N
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
