Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Not mentioned, J
Vandana Bansal (Dr. ) v. State of U. P. and Others
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the district magistrate's order regarding land use. (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding legal requirements for consent and compensation. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's observations on the applicability of laws and found authority. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. discussion on the authority under the acts for installation without consent. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14) |
| 5. conclusion on the validity of the district magistrate's decision. (Para 12 , 13 , 15) |
| 6. outcome of the petition being dismissed. (Para 16) |
1. By way of the present petition, the petitioner is challenging the order dated 04 December 2017 passed by District Magistrate. The case of the petitioner is that petitioner is the owner - in - possession and recorded tenure holder having valid title over the certain piece of land, whose khata numbers are also mentioned in para 2 of the writ petition. The case of the petitioner is that Power Grid Corporation of India and U.P. Power Corporation Ltd. are proposing to erect the electric poles over the petitioner's several plots without informing or taking her permission and also without following the procedure prescribed under relevant provisions of the Electricity Act ,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
