SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(All) 60

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Shyam Sundar Tripathi, J
Fahad and Others v. State of U. P. and Others


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents: S. P. Singh

1. Before we deal with the case at hand we would like to bring up an issue that has been obstructing the administration of justice. The court process is repeatedly delayed.
The doctors have been scribing medico legal report, injury report, bed head tickets, prescriptions and post - mortem examination reports in such handwriting that it cannot be read by the prosecutor, the defence lawyer or the Court. We are faced with a situation in which when the medico legal report was summoned, counsel for none of the parties or the Court could read the report on account of the way it was written. It transpires that Dr. Ashish Saxena had scribed it. Dr. Ashish Saxena had to be summoned to the court with typed copy of the medico legal report / injury report.

2. To bring the matter in context we hereby extract order dated 18.9.2018: -
' 1. Order dated 29.08.2018 reads as under:
' 1. Short affidavit has been filed in deference to order dated 3.8.2018, which is taken on record. Injury report has been appended.
Although, the xerox copy of the medical report is clear, however, handwriting of the doctor is such that it is not readable.
We hereby direct the author of the medical report to remain present in





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top