SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(All) 71

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Sanjay Kumar Singh, J.
Raghuvir Saran Madan Murari (M/s.) (Wholesaler) v. State of Uttar Pradesh and Another


1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned AGA for the opposite party No. 1 / State of U.P.

2. This criminal revision under S.397/401, Cr.P.C. has been filed by the revisionist with a prayer to set aside the impugned order dated 7.3.2019 passed by learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 1, Jhansi, whereby the application of the revisionist for release of seized essential commodity (food grains) in his favour has been rejected.

3. Issue
The issue for consideration before this Court is "whether the application under S.451, Cr.P.C. for release of seized food grains (case property) is maintainable during pendency of confiscation proceedings before the authority concerned under The Essential Commodities Act , 1955"?

4. Basic Facts
Filtering out unnecessary details, the brief facts giving rise to present criminal revision are that revisionist is wholesaler of food grains, pulses and oil seeds. On 10.1.2019, the opposite party No. 2 (District Manager, P.C.F. Jhansi) along with General Manager C.W.C. Chirgaon, Regional Manager P.C.F. Jhansi inspected the campus of Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti. At the time of inspection a truck No. UP 93 BT 4064 loaded with Urad w



























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top