Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Sanjay Harkauli, J
Prabhat Chandra Jain alias P. C. Jain and Another v. State of U. P. and Another
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. argument for quashing based on compromise (Para 1 , 7) |
| 2. background of matrimonial dispute and amicable settlement (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. mediation and its impact on proceedings (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. judicial discretion in quashing non-compoundable offences (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. final ruling on the petition's allowance (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
1. Heard Ms. Aprajita Bansal, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and Sri Vivek Bhatt, learned counsel for opposite party No.2.
2. This petition under S.482, Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the proceedings of Cri. Case No. 1309 of 2018; (State v. Sankalp Jain and others) arising out of Crime No.350 of 2016 under S.498 - A, 323, 504, 506, I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Vikas Nagar, District Lucknow pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow.
3. Brief facts of the case is that the son of applicants and opposite party No.2 were entered into wedlock on 30.07.2015 with sufficient dowry. After the marriage, applicant No.2 has kept all the jewellery with herself, which was given to opposite party No.2 in her marriage. She went to U.S.A. with her husband the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
