1. Heard Ms. Aprajita Bansal, learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. and Sri Vivek Bhatt, learned counsel for opposite party No.2.

2. This petition under S.482, Cr.P.C. has been filed by the applicant to quash the proceedings of Cri. Case No. 1309 of 2018; (State v. Sankalp Jain and others) arising out of Crime No.350 of 2016 under S.498 - A, 323, 504, 506, I.P.C. and 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, Police Station Vikas Nagar, District Lucknow pending before Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lucknow.

3. Brief facts of the case is that the son of applicants and opposite party No.2 were entered into wedlock on 30.07.2015 with sufficient dowry. After the marriage, applicant No.2 has kept all the jewellery with herself, which was given to opposite party No.2 in her marriage. She went to U.S.A. with her husband there the son of applicants forced opposite party No.2 for unnatural sex. Apart from that he started torturing her. On complaint of opposite party No.2, applicants did not help her rather they threatened to re - marry of their son. The opposite party No.2 returned India from U.S.A. and further the son of applicants did not sponsor her visa that is why she could not move f