Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Vinod Prasad, J
Pinkoo alias Jitendra – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case and investigation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 2. arguments highlighting inconsistencies in the prosecution case. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 28) |
| 3. analysis of evidence and credibility of witness testimonies. (Para 30 , 54 , 80) |
| 4. legal conclusion regarding the appeal. (Para 85) |
| 5. order of acquittal and directions post-judgment. (Para 86 , 87 , 88) |
1. Heard Sri Brijesh Sahai, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Sri Bhavya Sahai and Sri J.S. Audichya, learned counsel for the appellants, Sri Imran Ullah and Sri K.K. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record.
2. The aforesaid two criminal appeals arise out of judgment and order of conviction dated 18.12.2012 passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.6, Aligarh in Session Trial No. 600 of 2006 (State v. Pinkoo alias Jitendra and Smt. Ishwari Devi), concerning Case Crime No.04 of 2006, under S.302/34 and 114 ,I.P.C., Police Station Gandhi Park, District Aligarh and connected Session Trial No.601 of 2006 (State v. Pinkoo alias Jitendra), concerning Case Crime No.10 of 2006, under S.25, Arms Act , Police Sta
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
