Back
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Anil Kumar, J
Anirudh Kamal Shukla – Appellant
Versus
Enforcement Directorate – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the applicant's case involves allegations of fraud in loan acquisition linked to money laundering. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. contentions from both sides included the applicant's background and alleged involvement in financial irregularities. (Para 7 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. opposition by the enforcement directorate emphasized the gravity of the allegations and legal precedents regarding bail standards. (Para 11 , 12 , 17 , 19) |
| 4. the court emphasized the necessity for strict compliance with pmla conditions when considering bail. (Para 30 , 31) |
1. Heard Sri Anuj Tandon, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shiv P. Shukla, learned counsel for the Enforcement Directorate and perused the material placed on record.
2. The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Complaint Case No.15 of 2019, E.C.I.R. No. ECIR / 15 / PMLA / LZO / 2010, under S.3/4 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 at Police Station - Directorate Enforcement, District Lucknow with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.
3. The applicant is stated to have moved an anticipatory bail application before the Special Judge, PMLA Lucknow, which was rejected by it vide
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
