Jahida Begam v. State of U. P. - 2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 18630

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 18630

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
, J
Jahida Begam v. State of U. P.

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Amrendra Nath Tripathi, Shri Ashish Raman Mishra
For the Respondents: Shri Atul Kumar Dubey, Shri Sachin Srivastava

Table of Content
1. hearing has commenced with representation from all parties. (Para 1 , 2)
2. objection on maintainability regarding statutory remedy. (Para 3 , 4 , 5)
3. orders of recount are interlocutory as per precedents. (Para 6 , 7 , 10 , 11)
4. prescribed authority's decisions are subject to revision. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
5. petition dismissed due to availability of alternate remedy. (Para 16 , 18 , 21 , 23 , 25)

1. Heard Shri Amrendra Nath Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner along with Shri Ashish Raman Mishra, Advocate. Notice on behalf of the respondent Nos.1 and 2 has been accepted by the office of Chief Standing Counsel. Shri Atul Kumar Dubey, learned counsel has accepted notice for the respondent Nos.3 and 4. Shri Sachin Srivastava, learned counsel has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent No.5.

2. The instant petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Art.226 of the Constitution of India assailing the order dated 24.03.2023 passed by the Prescribed Authority / Sub Divisional Magistrate, Sadar, District Bahraich in Election Petition bearing Case No.3608/2021 (Computerized Case No.T202108150103608), whereby the Prescribed Authority while allowin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 18630

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT, JJahida Begam v. State of U. P.

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
, J
Jahida Begam v. State of U. P.