SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(All) 18632

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Shri Satish Trivedi, J
Chintoo alias Kuldeep – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Sessions Trial No.313 of 2016 | Sessions Trial No.314 of 2016



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Satish Trivedi, Shri Ajay Kumar Pandey
For the Respondents: A.G.A.

The court determined that inconsistent dying declarations and lack of corroborating evidence preclude conviction, emphasizing the burden on prosecution to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code - Sections 452, 376, 386, 506, 302 - Appeals against conviction - The trial court convicted Chintoo alias Kuldeep and Monti alias Ravindra based on inconsistent dying declarations, leading to serious doubts about credibility. The court emphasized that arrival at a conviction requires corroborative evidence to support dying declarations, particularly in light of notable inconsistencies and the absence of critical witnesses. (Paras 30, 67, 71)

(B) Dying Declaration - The court acknowledges the evidentiary weight of dying declarations but insists they must be reliable and corroborated when doubts arise. (Paras 39, 70)

(C) Benefit of the Doubt - The appellants were acquitted due to inconsistencies and uncertainties in the prosecution's case, emphasizing the presumption of innocence. (Paras 71, 72)

Facts of the case:
The complainant found his wife on fire after being assaulted and raped allegedly by Chintoo and Monti, leading to her death following treatment. The prosecution relied upon dying declarations, but doubts regarding their reliability arose during trial. (Paras 4, 5, 30)

Findings of Court:
The trial court's reliance on the dying declarations was called into question, leading to the conclusion that the prosecution did not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. (Paras 70, 72)

Issues: The main issues were credibility and reliability of the dying declarations, the conduct of key witnesses, and whether the prosecution overcame the burden of proof. (Paras 30, 34)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that inconsistencies in witness testimonies and the absence of corroborating evidence rendered the prosecution's case unsatisfactory, necessitating the acquittal of the accused. (Paras 71, 72)

Result: Appeals allowed; accused acquitted.

Table of Content
1. evidence of incident leading to death. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
2. prosecution evidence produced during trial. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
3. defence's argument against prosecution. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
4. analysis of evidence collected. (Para 31 , 32 , 35 , 36)
5. doubts regarding reliability of witness statements. (Para 60 , 61 , 66 , 69 , 70)
6. final judgment of acquittal. (Para 72)

1. We have heard Shri Satish Trivedi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Ajay Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the appellants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

2. These appeals have been filed against the judgment and order dated 21.01.2019, passed by learned Additional District and Sessions Judge / Fast Track Court No.2, Hapur, in Sessions Trial No.313 of 2016 (State v. Chintoo alias Kuldeep) and Sessions Trial No.314 of 2016 (State v. Monti alias Ravindra), arising out of Case Crime No.566 of 2015, under S.452, S.376, S.386, S.506, S.302 I.P.C., registered at Police Station Pilakhua, District Hapur, in which the trial court has convicted the accused - appellant Chintoo alias Kuldeep under S.452, S.376, S.386, S.506 and S.302 I.P.C. and the accused - appellant Monti alias Ravindra under S.452, S.386, S.506, S.302, S.376/511 I.P.C. The appellants have been sentenced to life imprisonment, besides other sentences in respective offences, apart from fine.

3. The prosecution case, in brief, is as under:

4. The complainant is a proprietor of a grocery shop in his village and had gone to Pilakhua to purchase groceries. On 8.10.2015, after the complainant returned from Pilakhua, District Hapur, U.P., at around 07:15 in the evening, the complainant saw his wife on fire. She fell in front of him. The complainant tried to douse the fire and received burn injuries on his feet and hand while dousing. After hearing the rescue call, Pinku, the complainant's cousin, reached the place of the incident and covered the complainant's wife with the blanket and doused the fire. The complainant's wife revealed to the complainant that in his absence, Chintoo and Monti, who lived beside them, came to her house and demanded money by extending a threat to his life. Chintoo forcibly committed rape upon her, and Monti attempted to commit rape. After that, they poured kerosene oil on her, set her on fire and fled away. The complainant further revealed that Chintoo and Monti were jealous of their family, and they used to quarrel with her when she asked for the payments of groceries that they had purchased; Chintoo and his brother Praveen had assaulted her few days before the incident.

5. The complainant immediately took his wife to G.T.B. Hospital, Delhi, for her treatment; the wife succumbed to the injuries and died on 15.10.2015.

6. The victim was admitted to G.T.B. Hospital, Delhi, at 09:25 p.m. on 8.10.2015 by her husband, and after that, Dr. Sushil prepared the MLC of the victim and declared the victim "fit for the statement". During this time, after receiving oral instructions, S.I. Manish Bhati, posted at Police Station G.T.B. Enclave, Delhi, reached the hospital and recorded the victim's statement, in which she stated that her husband runs a grocery shop at his home. About a month back, Chintoo's family borrowed groceries from their shop. Chintoo, Monti and Chintoo's brother Praveen thrashed her husband when he asked for the payment. Monti is a friend / relative of Chintoo and stays at his house. On 8.10.2015, her father - in - law had gone out of the house, and her husband had gone to buy goods for the shop. At around 07:00 p.m., Chintoo and Monti entered her house and started demanding money from her and extending threats to kill her husband. They caught her and pushed her down when she refused to give the money. Chintoo committed rape upon her, and Monti attempted to commit rape but could not succeed. They again asked her for money, and when she refused, they poured kerosene oil on her, kept in the cupboard, and set her on

































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top