SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(All) 2627

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Sri Arjun Singh Yadav, J
Sukarmpal Alias Amit Jat v. State of U. P


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Sri Babu Lal Ram
For the Respondents: Sri Ratan Singh

1. Heard Sri Arjun Singh Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Babu Lal Ram, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ratan Singh, learned AGA for the State.

2. The present writ petition has been preferred for quashing the FIR dated 29.02.2024 registered as Case Crime No.28 of 2024, under S.3(1) U.P. Gangster and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station - Alinagar, District - Chandauli and for a direction to respondents - State not to take coercive action against the petitioner pursuant to aforesaid FIR.

3. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that from perusal of the gang chart of the impugned FIR, it is clear that the charge sheet in the base case was filed on 20.12.2020 and after that, no case was registered against the petitioner and after more than three years impugned FIR was lodged on 29.02.2024 by approving the gang chart on 14.02.2024 which is in violation of proviso of R.4(2) of U.P. Gangster and Anti - Social Activities (Prevention) Rules, 2021 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Gangster Rules'). It is further submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned FIR was registered under S.3(1) of the Gangster Act without ment







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top