Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J
Daya Prasad alias Vyas Ji – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details and the incident background. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. investigation procedures and evidence collection. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. witness accounts and testimonies. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. expert testimonies and medical evidence. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. defense arguments regarding false implication. (Para 16 , 18 , 19) |
| 6. contradictions in witness testimonies. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. admissibility of confessions and recoveries. (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 8. lack of evidence connecting recovery to the accused. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 9. procedural flaws in investigations. (Para 30 , 31) |
| 10. legal principles regarding confessions and recoveries. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
| 11. reflections on investigative practices. (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 12. consolidated findings and necessary actions. (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 13. final judgment and order of acquittal. (Para 44 , 45 , 46) |
1. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 30.5.2013, passed by the Special Judge ( SC / ST Act ), Banda, in Special Criminal Case No. 43 of 2009 (State v. Daya Prasad alias Vyas Ji), arising out of Case Crime No.378 of 2008, Police Station Girvan, District Banda, whe
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
