IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Vinod Prasad, J
Maiku Lal v. State of U. P.
1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.
2. The present appeal has been filed under S.14 - A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short 'SC / ST Act') against the impugned order dated 07.10.2024 passed by Special Judge, SC / ST Act, Gonda in Crl. Misc. Case No.423 of 2024, under S.175 (3) of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short "BNSS") (Maiku Lal and others v. Vijay Bahadur and others), relating to P.S. Paraspur, District Gonda.
3. By the impugned order dated 07.10.2024, the trial Court rejected the application preferred by the appellants under S.175(3) B.N.S.S.
4. From the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants as also the averments made in the application under consideration, it is apparent that the order aforesaid has been impeached by the appellants on the ground that from a bare reading of the application under S.175(3) B.N.S.S. it is evident that cognizable offence is made out and as such the order dated 07.10.2024 rejecting the application under S.175(3) B.N.S.S. is liable to be interfered with by this Court.
5. Per contra, learned A.G.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.