SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(All) 2637

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Vinod Prasad, J
Maiku Lal v. State of U. P.


1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants and learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the records.

2. The present appeal has been filed under S.14 - A (1) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (in short 'SC / ST Act') against the impugned order dated 07.10.2024 passed by Special Judge, SC / ST Act, Gonda in Crl. Misc. Case No.423 of 2024, under S.175 (3) of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (in short "BNSS") (Maiku Lal and others v. Vijay Bahadur and others), relating to P.S. Paraspur, District Gonda.

3. By the impugned order dated 07.10.2024, the trial Court rejected the application preferred by the appellants under S.175(3) B.N.S.S.

4. From the submissions made by the learned counsel for the appellants as also the averments made in the application under consideration, it is apparent that the order aforesaid has been impeached by the appellants on the ground that from a bare reading of the application under S.175(3) B.N.S.S. it is evident that cognizable offence is made out and as such the order dated 07.10.2024 rejecting the application under S.175(3) B.N.S.S. is liable to be interfered with by this Court.

5. Per contra, learned A.G.







































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top