SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(All) 2640

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Rajesh Singh Chauhan, J
State – Appellant
Versus
Mubarak Ali – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Shri Anil Kumar Mishra
For the Respondents: None

Table of Content
1. the incident and allegations against the accused. (Para 1 , 2 , 18)
2. appellate court's standards on acquittal. (Para 14 , 15)
3. evidence inadequacies leading to upholding acquittal. (Para 20 , 22 , 23)

1. The present appeal purports to be under S.378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (in short 'CrPC.') seeks to challenge the judgment and order dated 06.02.2021 passed by Additional District and Sessions Judge, Court No.6, Saharanpur in Sessions Trial No.523 of 2015 in case crime No.81 of 2015 (State v. Mubarak Ali and three others), S.T. No.577 of 2015 (State v. Wasil) in case crime No.81 of 2015, Police Station - Gangoh, District - Saharanpur whereby the accused - respondent Nos. 1 to 4 have been acquitted under charges 395/412 IPC and accused No.5 under S.395 of IPC.

2. Facts

The prosecution theory in brief is that P.W.1, Nathiram, the informant had lodged a first information report on 02.03.2015 in police station - Gangoh, Saharanpur alleging that on 01.03.2015 at 11:30 pm when he along with his brother, Dharmendra, P.W.2 were driving a four wheeler Bolero Maxx Truck Mahindra, Registration No. UP - 11 - AT - 0204 Chassis No.3826571 and Engine No.GLI -

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top