Back
UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUCKNOW
Rajendra Singh (Presiding Member), *Vikas Saxena (Member)
Allahabad Bank – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Kumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the complaint initiated by the plaintiff regarding fixed deposit issuance. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. bank's defensive arguments regarding lack of signature on the debit voucher. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. consideration of the contractual obligations in fixed deposit issuance. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. legal principles regarding unlawful enrichment and absence of contractual obligations. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. final ruling regarding the appeal's allowance. (Para 9) |
1. This appeal has been filed by the Opposite party of the main Complaint, the Allahabad Bank, Gorakhpur, against the judgment and order dated 26.2.2015 passed by the District Consumer Forum Gorakhpur in Comp. No. 427, 2012, Mahesh Kumar v. Allahabad Bank and Others. In the said judgment, compensation and other reliefs have been awarded to the plaintiff accepting the Complaint of the plaintiff.
2. The plaintiff submitted the complaint with the averments that he had been issued an FD by the O.P., Allahabad Bank on 6.7.2009 for a sum of Rs.25,000 for a period of 36 months and its maturity was on 6.7.2012 with the maturity amount Rs. 31,243. On 24.8.2012, the plaintiff applied to the opposite party for the payment of the maturity amount, but the pay
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
