HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Sri Hiralal .....Revisionist(s)

Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)

Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Chakshuvendra Pachauri Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Atul Pandey, G.A.

Court No. - 89 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J.

1. Heard Sri Chakshuvendra Parhauri, learned counsel for the revisionist, Sri Atul Pandey, learned counsel for opposite party no.

2, and the learned A.G.A. for the State.

2. This criminal revision has been filed by the revisionist seeking to set aside the order dated 16-05-2024 passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Pilibhit in Case No. 261 of 2019 (Smt. Kamla Devi vs. Sri Hiralal), under Section 125 Cr.P.C., whereby the learned Trial Court directed the revisionist to pay Rs.

5,000/- per month from the date of the application.

3. Learned counsel for the revisionist submitted that the revisionist completed his L.L.B. in the year 2016 and is preparing for competitive examinations. It is further submitted that he has started his practice in the District Court under the guidance of senior counsel, and his income is highly uncertain. Sometimes he earns Rs. 300–400/- per day and sometimes he does not earn