HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
SANTOSH RAI, J
Rehan – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. applicant's criminal history examined for bail consideration. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. legislation on bail emphasizes individual rights and public safety. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. conditions set forth to prevent bail misuse. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J.
1. Learned counsel for the applicant is permitted to correct the date of detention in the bail application.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Anil Kumar Singh, learned AGA for the State-respondents and perused the record.
3. This bail application has been moved on behalf of accused-applicant Rehan seeking enlargement on bail in Case Crime No.285 of 2025, under Section 3(1) U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station Sarai Khwaja, District Jaunpur, during pendency of trial.
4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that according to the gang chart the applicant is said to have been involved in only one criminal case in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. Apart from the one case, the applicant has criminal history of five more cases explained in para-7 of the bail application in which he has also been enlarged on bail. He has falsely
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.