Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Anish Kumar Gupta, J
Smt. Rashmi Sundrani – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction and procedural details concerning case filing (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. factual background of the fir and initial investigations (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. history of legal actions taken by parties involved (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. arguments and claims made by the petitioner regarding false accusations (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. counterarguments supporting the fir claims (Para 14 , 15) |
| 6. legal considerations of further investigation rights under crpc (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. judicial interpretation of sections in relation to further investigation (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 8. case law supporting police investigation rights post-cognizance (Para 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 9. critical overview of the police's statutory investigation powers (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 10. implications of judicial rulings on investigation processes (Para 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 11. summary of identifiable principles for future investigations (Para 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 12. final orders and decisions by the court concerning furnished arguments (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 13. distinct legal interpretations affecting the trial process (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42) |
| 14. overall conclusion and operational directives for trial (Para 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
