HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD Om Prakash And 3 Others .....Petitioner(s)

Versus State Of U.P. And 9 Others .....Respondent(s)

Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mukti Nath Dwivedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Prashant Singh, Sher Bahadur Singh Court No. - 88 HON'BLE VINOD DIWAKAR, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State-

respondent, and perused the entire record.

2. The present petition has been filed challenging the legality and correctness of the impugned judgment and order dated 07.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge/Fast Track Court–II, Court No.24, Shahjahanpur in Criminal Revision No.199 of 2024, Om Prakash and others v. Guru Dayal and others, whereby the revisional court affirmed the order dated 30.08.2024 passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Tehsil Tilhar, District Shahjahanpur in Case No.273 of 2023, Guru Dayal and others v. Om Prakash and others, initiated under Section 133 Cr.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the entire proceedings under Section 133 Cr.P.C. were initiated by respondent nos. 3 to 9 due to long-standing village enmity. It is argued that there is no obstruction created by t