SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Online)(All) 42

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
Dinesh And 8 Others – Appellant
Versus
State of U.P. and Another – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [List of names]
For the Respondents: [List of names]

1. Heard learned counsel for the appellants, learned counsel for informant and Acharya Rajesh Tripathi, learned AGA for State.

2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A (1) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been preferred by the appellants against the order dated 27.07.2022 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Aligarh, in Complaint Case No. 02 of 2022, under Sections 323, 506, 452, and 354 of the LP.C. and Section 3 (1)(R) of the SC/ST Act, at Police Station Khair, District Aligarh.

3. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that the appellants have been falsely implicated in the present case by the respondent/informant, as an FIR had been lodged against her prior to the filing of this complaint. He submitted that an FIR in Case Crime No. 442 of 2021, under Sections 147, 323, 308, 504, and 506 IPC, Police Station Khair, District Aligarh, was lodged by the appellants against the informant and her family members on 07.09.2021. Other family members of the appellants had also sustained injuries, and the said injury reports are on record.

4. He further submitted that the informant is originally a resident of West Beng

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top